Model Number Finder

Whirlpool WFW4090N Specs: Capacity, Dimensions & Energy Use

The WFW4090N is a 2 cu ft (57 L) front load washer sized at 35 × 26 × 26 in. It draws 120V and is certified at 94 kWh and 2,503 gallons of water per year.

Full specification table

SpecificationValue
Model numberWFW4090N
BrandWhirlpool
Appliance typeWashing Machines
ConfigurationFront Load
Capacity (US)2 cu ft
Capacity (metric)57 litres
Height35 in (889 mm)
Width26 in (660 mm)
Depth26 in (660 mm)
Voltage120V
Annual energy94 kWh/year
Annual water2,503 gal/year
IMEF2.07
IWF4.2
Connected modelNo
First ENERGY STAR listing2022-04

What these numbers mean in practice

Capacity

2 cu ft is a compact drum for a front load machine. As a rule of thumb, one cubic foot holds roughly 3–4 kg of dry laundry, so this drum handles about 7 kg per load — enough for a small household load.

Running cost

At 94 kWh per year, five years of use is about 470 kWh. Water use of 2,503 gallons a year works out to roughly 12,515 gallons over five years — the number that matters if you are on a metered water supply.

IMEF and IWF

IMEF is the integrated modified energy factor: higher is better, and it is the number behind the kWh figure. IWF is the integrated water factor: lower is better, and it is the number behind the gallons figure. Both are certified values, not marketing claims.

Will it fit?

Allow at least 1 in of clearance on each side and 4–6 in behind for the fill and drain hoses. That means a cut-out of about 28 in wide, 36 in high and 31 in deep. Measure the doorway on the route in, not just the final spot.

Related pages for the WFW4090N

Compare with similar capacity

How the WFW4090N differs from its closest siblings

These are the models most often confused with the WFW4090N. The differences below are computed from our own records, not copied from a marketing sheet.

vs WFH5424S

  • 0.8 cu ft larger drum (2.8 vs 2)
  • 2.3000000000000007 in shallower/shorter (23.7 vs 26 in)
  • 14 kWh/yr less energy (80 vs 94)
  • 140 gal/yr more water (2,643 vs 2,503)
  • 1 variants listed for the WFH5424S vs 0 here

Shared: both front load.

vs WEF5727T

  • 2.5 cu ft larger drum (4.5 vs 2)
  • 1 in deeper/taller (27 vs 26 in)
  • 6 in deeper/taller (32 vs 26 in)
  • 46 kWh/yr more energy (140 vs 94)
  • 1,745 gal/yr more water (4,248 vs 2,503)
  • an official PDF is published for the WEF5727T but not for this one

Shared: both front load.

Related: the full parts list for the WFW4090N · specifications

Where this data comes from

One source is listed above because it is the only place this page draws from. We publish facts we can point to — no republished manual text, no hosted PDFs, no invented model numbers or error codes.